Legal Opinion
Baker v. Chaney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 16, 1934No. 21689PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Kiowa county, Okla., wherein defendant in error, Nora Chaney, as plaintiff, recovered a judgment from plaintiff in error, W. U. Baker, as defendant. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.
The facts out of which the controversy grew are substantially as follows: In Januuary, 1918, one Rowland was the owner of a brick store building in Hobart, and leased this building to the Bratton Dry Goods Company, a corporation, for a period of five 3'ears. In the contract Rowland agreed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Swindler v. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Beggs Oil Co. v. DeardorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Tidal Refining Co. v. Charles E. Knox Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wright v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Adams v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Coline Oil Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Campbell v. PeerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Oklahoma City v. DobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943