Legal Opinion

Adams v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1940No. 29016PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover damages by reason of the pollution of a stream and overflow of land of the plaintiff which he held under an agricultural lease. The allegations of the petition are in three causes of action: (1) The loss of a spring; (2) the loss of a mule; (3) the loss'of a well.

At the conclusion of the evidence offered by the plaintiff the defendants demurred- to the evidence, which demurrer was sustained. Motion for new trial of the plaintiff in error was filed and overruled, and plaintiff alleges error.

As to the causes of action 1 and 3, relating'to the loss of the spring and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cain v. Quannah Light & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Bland v. Lawyer-Cuff Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. All American Bus Lines v. SaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Eberle v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. American National Bank of Enid v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Valles v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sykes v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API