Adams v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an action to recover damages by reason of the pollution of a stream and overflow of land of the plaintiff which he held under an agricultural lease. The allegations of the petition are in three causes of action: (1) The loss of a spring; (2) the loss of a mule; (3) the loss'of a well.
At the conclusion of the evidence offered by the plaintiff the defendants demurred- to the evidence, which demurrer was sustained. Motion for new trial of the plaintiff in error was filed and overruled, and plaintiff alleges error.
As to the causes of action 1 and 3, relating'to the loss of the spring and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cain v. Quannah Light & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Bland v. Lawyer-Cuff Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- All American Bus Lines v. SaxonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Eberle v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- American National Bank of Enid v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Valles v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Sykes v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.