Legal Opinion

Eisenhauer v. New York Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1936No. Appeal, 271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

The New York Life Insurance Company, appellant, on various dates issued to Homer Eisenhauer, appellee, six policies of life insurance, each containing, in part, the following disability clause: “Disability shall be considered total whenever the insured is so disabled by bodily injury or disease that he is wholly prevented from performing any work, from following any occupation, or from engaging in any business for remuneration or profit......” Under this provision, assured furnished due proof that he was totally and permanently disabled as of May 27,1929, which proof was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Cantor v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Amrovcik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Fannick v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Milich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Reardon v. Travelers Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API