Eisenhauer v. New York Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
James, J.,
The New York Life Insurance Company, appellant, on various dates issued to Homer Eisenhauer, appellee, six policies of life insurance, each containing, in part, the following disability clause: “Disability shall be considered total whenever the insured is so disabled by bodily injury or disease that he is wholly prevented from performing any work, from following any occupation, or from engaging in any business for remuneration or profit......” Under this provision, assured furnished due proof that he was totally and permanently disabled as of May 27,1929, which proof was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Cantor v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Amrovcik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Cobosco v. Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Fannick v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Milich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Reardon v. Travelers Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.