Cooper v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Kephart,
The accident policies under which appellee claims are identical in that they provided that if an accidental injury should “continuously and wholly disable and prevent the insured from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to the occupation in which he is engaged at the time of the accident” the company would pay insured a weekly indemnity fifty-two weeks, and “. . .if the insured shall then and thereafter be continuously and wholly disabled by such injuries, independently of all other causes, from engaging in any and every occupation or employment for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Indiana Life Endowment Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- B. & O. Employees' Rel. Ass'n v. PostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Hurley v. Bankers Life Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Starling v. Supreme Council Royal Templars of TemperanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Sebastianelli v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- ætna Life Ins. Co. v. MoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.