Amrovcik v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
The plaintiff brought this action to recover permanent disability benefits allegedly payable to him under the permanent disability riders attached to two policies of insurance issued by the defendant company to him. The relevant portions of the policies, which are identical, are as follows: “TOTAL AND PERMANENT DISABILITY PROVISION...... The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ...... Doth Hereby Agree, that if while the above numbered Policy is in full force and effect, and before default in the payment of any premium, the Company receives due proof that the Insured, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Losnecki v. Mutual L. Ins. Co. of N. Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Walters v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- ætna Life Ins. Co. v. MoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Astrin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Becker v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.