Legal Opinion

Milich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1941No. Appeals, 126 and 127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldrige, J.,

Opinion bx

The plaintiff brought two suits in assumpsit. Each action was based upon a policy of insurance issued to the plaintiff by the defendant, which contained a supplementary contract attached to and made part of the policy providing for certain payments to be made to the plaintiff in the event of his becoming, before the age of 60 years, totaJly and permanently disabled as the result of bodily injury or disease so as to prevent him “from engaging in any occupation and performing any work for compensation or profit, and that such disability has already continued…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Cantor v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Lyford v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Amrovcik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woolford v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Bundy v. National Safety Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Frace v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. White v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Union Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API