Cantor v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Giovanni Pannone v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, 157 Atl. Rep. 876; Smith v. Supreme Lodge, 61 Pacific Reporter 116; Maresh v. Peoria Life Insurance Company, 133 Kansas 191.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The plaintiff had a life insurance policy in the defendant company which contained a clause waiving payment of premiums and providing for the payment of monthly benefits to the insured on his furnishing due proof to the company that he had become totally and permanently disabled and would for his lifetime be unable to perform any work or engage in any busi ness for compensation or profit. The relevant provisions of the policy are printed in the margin. 1
In November, 1922, plaintiff gave notice to the company that he was totally and permanently disabled within the meaning…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Consona v. R. E. Coulborn & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Maresh v. Peoria Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Clarke v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Amrovcik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Bubany v. New York Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Feigenbaum v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.