Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Sengel
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
The appellant company insured the appellee against loss by burglary of property in appellee’s safe in its place of business. While the policy was in force, burglars entered appellee’s place of business and feloniously abstracted from said safe a sum of money. The appellant denied liability under the terms of its policy, and this suit was then instituted and the case submitted to the trial court on the policy of insurance and an agreed statement of facts.
The facts necessary for an understanding of the issues and such as are relevant to the question presented are as follows: the safe insured…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Blank v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Brill v. Metropolitan Surety Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Ballard County BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Moskovitz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. of America v. HenshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Leeds, Inc. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Blacknall v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. McCulleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.