Legal Opinion
Moskovitz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 7, 1919No. 21,396PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $396.82 upon defendant’s burglary policy. The case was tried before Finehout, J., who made finding’s and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount demanded. From an order denying its alternative motion for amended findings or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibeul, J.
Action on a policy of burglary insurance issued by the defendant to the .plaintiff. There were findings for the plaintiff 'and the defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
By the policy .the defendant promised as follows:
“To indemnify the assured for all loss by burglary occasioned by the abstraction of any of such property from the interior of any safe or vault described in the declarations and located in the assured’s premises, by any person or persons making felonious entry into such safe or vault by *99actual force aud violence of which force and violence there…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- T. J. Bruner Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Blank v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Brill v. Metropolitan Surety Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Ferguson v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Reliable Auto Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SengelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Schubach v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.