Legal Opinion

Blacknall v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1932No. 8854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

Suit was brought by appellant against ap-pellee on a policy of insurance against burglary of a safe “through the forcible opening upon the premises, when not open for business of such safe, effected by means of explosives, tools or chemicals, of which forcible opening there shall remain visible marks upon the exterior of such safe while such safe is duly closed and locked by at least one combination or time lock.”

The case was fried by the court, who found that, while the policy was in force, while plaintiff’s place of business was closed and locked, his safe was opened, that there were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Silberberg Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. National Surety Co. v. ChalkleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Ballard County BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SengelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Schubach v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swanson, Inc. v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Continental Insurance Company v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  3. Remedial Finance Corp. v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of N. A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. VexlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. BlacknallTexas Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API