Brill v. Metropolitan Surety Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District. Action by Abe Brill against the Metropolitan Surety Company. From a j'udgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Per curiam
This is an action brought upon a policy of burglary insurance in the sum.of $500, issued to plaintiff by defendant for loss by burglary, theft, or larceny of money or property from the safe in plaintiff’s premises. The plaintiff’s claim is based upon an alleged burglary on the night of April 25, 1908, in which the sum of $83.28 was abstracted from the safe. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that no cause of action had been shown, for the reason that the evidence did not bring the case within the provisions of the policy, which were that…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Moskovitz v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Inglis v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SengelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Old Colony Insurance v. MoskiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.