Legal Opinion

Commercial Casualty Insurance v. McCulley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 28, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is earnestly insisted by counsel for the defendant that there is no liability under the terms of the policy because the plaintiff was thrown from the platform of the train on which he was riding, and because a part of his injuries were sustained by being struck by a passing automobile after the train had jerked him onto the adjacent highway.

We have copied clauses 1 and 14 under which liability is claimed in our statement of facts, and need not repeat them here. We think that a reasonable construction of the clauses referred to show liability upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SengelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Life & Accident Insurance v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Kernodle v. Peerless Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Universal Life & Accident Insurance v. StuartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Pinson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Pinson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API