Ventura County v. Clay
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. B. T. Williams, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendants on demurrer to the complaint; and whether or not the lower court erred in sustaining the demurrer is the only matter in controversy.
The defendant Clay was elected to the office of treasurer of said county for the term commencing on the first Monday in January, 1893, and the other defendants are sureties on his official bond for that term, and this action is upon that official bond to recover money alleged to have been unlawfully paid out from the treasury of said county by Clay during said term of office.
The complaint consists…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Linden v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Bailey v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- County of Los Angeles v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Merriam v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Hedges v. DamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hammell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Somers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Frost v. MighettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Town of Buyck v. BuyckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Jacks v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.