Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Frost v. Mighetto

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1937No. Civ. 2023PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in which each respondent was awarded separate damages against appellants. The principal question raised on appeal is the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of San Diego County over the several causes of action stated in the complaint. The damages were all suffered in a single collision between motor vehicles.

The complaint is made unnecessarily prolix by separating each plaintiff’s demand into several unnecessary causes of action. Everard C. and Bertha L. Frost were husband and wife, as were Guy O. and Lillian Castle.

Everard C. Frost sought recovery of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hammell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bailey v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Meisner v. McIntoshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In Re StrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Little v. Stuyvesant Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API