Jacks v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus. The petitioner in the court below will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff, and the respondent in that court as the defendant.
The plaintiff prayed for and procured a judgment, commanding the defendant, James Taylor, as the Treasurer of Monterey County, to pay to the plaintiff, as the assignee of one Anson Herrick, the sum of three thousand five hundred dollars, which the petition for the writ alleged had been previously allowed and ordered paid by the board of supervisors of said county to said Herrick, as the assignee of Lester, Herrick & Herrick,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Brady v. . the Mayor, C., of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Linden v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Biggart v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Calistoga Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Jacks v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.