Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Lankershim

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1893No. 19235PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

The defendant was one of the sureties on the official bond of J. W. Broaded, treasurer of plaintiff, for the term of two years commencing on the first Monday of January, 1887; and this action is upon that bond to recover $7,910.80 for alleged delinquencies of the treasurer during that term. Broaded died November 29, 1889, and this action was commenced May 5,1890.

The cause was tried by the court, and judgment rendered for plaintiff for the sum of $7,371.60.

*527The defendant has appealed from the judgment, and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The judgment includes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Condee v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Wunderlin v. CadoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Bate v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. School District Number Two v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Knowlton v. MackenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Taber v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Biggart v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API