Legal Opinion

Linden v. Case

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873No. 3,800PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, Alameda County. An injunction was granted restraining the defendants from erecting a Hall of Records or other county buildings for Alameda County, from contracting any debt or liability on behalf of the county for or on account of such buildings, and from allowing any accounts against the county thereon. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Belcher, J.:

This action was brought by the plaintiff, as a citizen and taxpayer of Alameda County, to enjoin the defendants, who composed the Board of Supervisors of the county, from *173doing certain acts mentioned in the complaint. A temporary injunction was granted upon the complaint, and from this order the appeal is taken.

The substance of the complaint is that the county seat of Alameda has been removed, in accordance with law, from San Leandro, where it has hitherto been located, to the City of Oakland; that the defendants, at a meeting of the Board, have determined to locate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Raun & Plant v. Bd. of Supervisors of El Dorado Cty.California Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Branch Tpk. Co. v. Bd. Supervisors Yuba Cty.California Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Trinity County v. McCammonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. County of Modoc v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stevens v. St. Mary's Training SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bowles v. Neely, MayorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API