Legal Opinion

Somers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1923No. S. F. No. 10260PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant appeals from a judgment against it by default, it having declined to answer after the overruling of its demurrer to the complaint. It is alleged in the complaint that on or about the twenty-second day of November, 1912, plaintiff's assignor, the W. J. Somers Company, entered into a written contract of lease with Force-Hewitt Company of certain premises in San Francisco for a term of three years, and that the latter occupied said premises under said lease up to the time of the assignment hereinafter referred to; that on or about the fourteenth day of July, 1915, the said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. People's Lumber Co. v. GillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. United American Fire Insurance Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Zalkind v. Ceradyne, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. In Re Estate of LashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API