Haggblom v. City of Dillingham
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A Dillingham ordinance provides that any animal that bites a person without provocation shall be deemed vicious and, after quarantine, shall be euthanized. A Dillingham dog owner whose dog bit a co-worker without provocation appeals the city’s order, affirmed by the superior court, for euthanasia or banishment of the animal. Finding no constitutional or procedural infirmity, we affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
On April 12, 2006, Lisa Haggblom took her dog Muñeca with her to work. She confined Muñeca in her office behind a child gate. While…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Roberts v. Community Hospitals of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Gottstein v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Riddle v. LanserAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases, In the Matter of the 2021 Redistricting Cases (Alaska Redistricting Board / Girdwood / East Anchorage)Alaska Supreme Court · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.