Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Fairbanks North Star Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1985No. S-391PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case concerns the proper measure of damages for the death of a pet dog caused by a municipality’s negligence. The Fairbanks North Star Borough Animal Shelter (hereafter Borough or pound) violated a Borough ordinance and mistakenly killed the Richardsons’ pet dog, Wizzard. The Richardsons had owned the dog for about two months. At trial the superior court limited the damage award to the dog’s market value or replacement cost. The Rich-ardsons appeal the measure of damages applied by the court. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

After an unsuccessful search for their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kenai Lumber Co., Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. La Porte v. Associated Independents, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1964
  5. Gill v. BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kim Brown v. Muhlenberg TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Ronald Borden v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Ronald Borden v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Tanner v. Rite Aid of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API