Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2016No. 7114 S-15010/S-15030/S-15039PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska's medical emancipation statute historically allowed minors to consent to pregnancy-related health care subject to an express exception for pregnancy termination. In 2001 we held that under the Alaska Con*1128stitution's broad privacy guarantee a pregnant minor has the same fundamental privacy right to reproductive choice as an adult, and in 2007 we held that right cannot be conditioned on another's consent. The 2007 ruling allowed minors to obtain all pregnaan-cy-related health care-including pregnancy termination-without parental consent.

But in that 2007…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Virginia v. American Booksellers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. Planned Parenthood of the Great NorthwestAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Jacob S.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Dennis O. v. Stephanie O.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Wielechowski v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API