Legal Opinion
Gottstein v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 2010No. S-12942, S-13096PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Interest holders in an oil and gas lease appealed to the superior court from three final agency decisions relating to the lease. The superior court affirmed the ageney decisions and the interest holders separately appealed to us, arguing that: (1) they were wrongfully denied an agency hearing on the first agency decision; (2) the first agency decision is insufficient for appellate review and otherwise lacks sufficient findings or a reasonable basis; (8) the other agency decisions should be set aside because of the deficiencies in the first agency…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ridge Oil Co., Inc. v. Guinn Investments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bata Shoe Company, Inc., United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Christensen v. NCH Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alaskan Crude Corp. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Patrick v. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage Transportation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Horner-Neufeld v. University of Alaska Fairbanks, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Pacifica Marine, Inc. v. Solomon Gold, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.