Legal Opinion
Treacy v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 2004No. S-9800, S-10149PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This consolidated appeal challenges the juvenile curfew ordinance enacted by the Municipality of Anchorage. In one case, David Treacy appeals from a hearing officer’s finding that he violated the ordinance and that the ordinance is constitutional. In a separate case, the Municipality of Anchorage appeals from a superior court determination that the ordinance is unconstitutional. We conclude that the municipality has a compelling interest in protecting juveniles and curbing juvenile crime, and that there is a sufficient connection between the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.