Legal Opinion
Cockerham Ex Rel. Cockerham v. Stokes County Board of Education
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided February 3, 2004No. 1:03 CV 00227PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
OSTEEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher Cockerham, by and through his guardian ad litem, Denise M. Gold, brings this action against Defendants Stokes County Board of Education, Scarlet Mooney, and Joe Childers 1 (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (“Title IX”). This matter is now before the-court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Federal' Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated herein, the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman v. Baltimore Police Dept.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Sheaffer v. County of ChathamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Inman v. Klockner-Pentaplast of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
- Johnson v. AngelsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Signal v. GonzalesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006