Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Baltimore Police Dept.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 29, 2005No. CIV. WMN-04-3072PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss. Paper No. 13. Also pending is Defendants’ Motion To Seal the Entire Record. Paper No. 14. 1 Both motions are fully briefed. Upon a review of the pleadings and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary, Local Rule 105.6, and that the motion to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part, and the motion to seal will be denied in its entirety.
/. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was employed briefly by the Baltimore City Police Department [BPD] as an attorney…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Alexander v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Schmidt v. Town of CheverlyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Williams v. Guilford Technical Community College Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Franklin v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Tann v. FisherDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.