Lockbihler v. Young
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a decree of distribution of the Superior Court of Wapa County and from an order setting aside certain property as community property and from an order setting apart a homestead. E. D. Ham,.Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
These are appeals by two sisters of the deceased, Anna Young, from the decree of distribution made in the matter of her estate, from an order setting aside certain property as community property, and from an order setting aside the homestead to C. H. Young, the surviving husband.
Anna Young died testate on the 29th of April, 1894, and in due time her will was admitted to probate. That will is as follows:
“Calistoga, the 15th of April, 1894.
“Anna Young’s Will.—To C. H. Young, my husband, my bank book shall be handet to him, with gold watch and chain, also two deeds. After my husband deatts the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Arthur v. ArthurNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Phelps v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- In re Estate of ShillaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- DeParcq v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.