Legal Opinion

Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1912No. Civ. No. 1022PublishedCited by 39 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of supersedeas upon appeal from a judgment of condemnation of land. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Arthur C. Huston, and White, Miller & McLaughlin, for Petitioner's. T. T. C. Gregory, Elmer W. Armfield, C. J. Goodell, and Mastick & Partridge, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is an application for a writ of supersedeas to prevent the Vallejo and Northern Railroad Company from taking possession of certain real estate during the pendency of an appeal from a judgment of condemnation. The petition for the writ alleges that the Reed Orchard Company has been and now is the owner in fee of a certain tract of land containing one hundred and forty acres, more or less, in Tolo county, known as the Reed Orchard; that petitioner, the People’s Savings Bank, has been and now is the holder of a deed of trust covering the whole of said property and securing over $35,000 due…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Markey v. LangleySupreme Court of the United States · 1876

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. State Highway Commission v. RawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. City of San Francisco v. Tillman Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rowland v. McBrideArizona Supreme Court · 1929

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API