Legal Opinion

Thorsby v. Babcock

California Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1950No. S. F. 18192PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Williston A. Babcock is the judgment debtor in an action brought by Carl E. Thorsby and his wife. After the entry of judgment, Babcock sold real property upon which he had placed a homestead. The Thorsbys are endeavoring to obtain the proceeds of the sale in satisfaction of the judgment, and the appeal is from an order determining that the money is not exempt from execution.

The facts are not in dispute. It appears that at the time of the sale, in addition to the Thorsby judgment a writ of attachment had been levied by the Bank of America against the property. The sale was consummated through…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Maloney v. HeferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Gray v. DealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Robert Lee White, Dba Aanco Fence Company, Debtor. Cheryl White v. Robert Lee WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. White v. Brown (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. In Re GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Lee v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API