Legal Opinion

Patterson v. San Francisco & San Mateo Electric Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1905No. S.F. No. 3361PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

In this action plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendant.

A verdict was returned in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. On March 12, 1901, about midnight, plaintiff and his wife took passage on one of the cars of defendant, at the corner of Fourteenth and Valencia streets, in the city of San Francisco, for their home on Thirtieth Street in said city. The car turned into Guerrero Street, and as it approached Twenty-second Street the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. LauricellaTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Osgood v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Reed v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cody v. Market St. Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API