Legal Opinion

Cody v. Market St. Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1905No. S.F. No. 3489PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ■

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been received by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant while alighting from one of defendant’s ears, upon which she was a passenger. She obtained judgment for seven hundred and fifty dollars, and defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The only points made on this appeal relate to the action of the trial court in the matter of instructing the jury.

1. The case made by plaintiff was substantially as follows, viz.: Being a passenger on a northbound Bevisadero-Street car, in the city and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Birmingham Union Railway Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. McCurrie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Osgood v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1902

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API