Legal Opinion

Osgood v. Los Angeles Traction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1902No. L.A. No. 1162PublishedCited by 35 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries to plaintiff, resulting from a collision between defendant’s (the Los Angeles Traction Com- party’s) street-ears, on which plaintiff was a passenger, and a car of the defendant (the Los Angeles Railway Company), a separate and different corporation. Both companies were joined as defendants, hut at the trial plaintiff dismissed the action as to the latter company. Plaintiff had the verdict of the jury, and defendant appeals from the judgment and order denying motion for a new trial.

The following instruction was given…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McCurrie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Babcock v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Harrison v. Sutter Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API