Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Urgo

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1923No. L. A. No. 7258PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

On October 4, 1920, appellant, Motor Transit Company, corporation, a carrier of passengers for reward, was operating a motor-bus line upon the public highway connecting the city of Riverside and the city of Los Angeles. Respondent, Sanford C. Scarborough, having paid his fare, took passage on one of appellant’s busses at Riverside westerly bound for Los Angeles. M. Urgo, defendant, was, on said day, operating, as owner, a motor-truck traveling on said highway in an easterly direction. On a section of said highway known as Valley Boulevard, at a point near Walnut, while rounding a curve in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Diller v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API