Legal Opinion

Mullin v. Gano

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1930No. Appeal, 145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

From a judgment against him in an action of deceit, defendant prosecutes this appeal. The only error disclosed by the record is in sustaining the verdict for a larger amount than plaintiff, by his own showing, was entitled to recover. This we have a right to and will correct without reversing the judgment: Summers v. Kramer, 271 Pa. 189; Lukens v. Wharton Ave. Baptist Church, 296 Pa. 1; Whalen v. Smith Fireproof Construction Co., 296 Pa. 10.

Defendant and others entered into an agreement to purchase a tract of land in Florida, and paid the down-money required.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Summers v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Levine v. Pittsburgh State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Gillespie v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Curtis v. BuzardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Browning v. RodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Benjamin Kaufman, Nathan P. Jacobs, Philip Kessler, Morris Rapoport and Martin Bruce v. Mellon National Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. Waychoff v. WaychoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Neuman v. Schweidel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API