Legal Opinion
Benjamin Kaufman, Nathan P. Jacobs, Philip Kessler, Morris Rapoport and Martin Bruce v. Mellon National Bank and Trust Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 14, 1966No. 14975PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action in which the claims for damages are based on fraud, breach of contract and promissory estoppel. At the close of the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict in its favor and decision thereon was reserved. The issues were submitted to the jury on special interrogatories, as authorized by Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., rule 49, 28 U.S.C.A. The jury reported its inability to agree and was then discharged.
Thereafter the defendant moved for judgment in accordance with its earlier motion. The motion was granted and this appeal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Fried v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Payne v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Stelmack v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Rennie & Laughlin, Inc., a Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Sowell v. Butcher & Singer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.