Legal Opinion

Browning v. Rodman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1920No. Appeal, No. 274PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal, No. 274, Jan. T., 1920, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Bradford Co., May T., 1915, No. 210, on verdict for defendants in case of W, D. Browning v. Edwin L. Rodman and Nina B. Rodman. Issue to determine amount due on judgment. Before Maxwell, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict and judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 274, Jan. T., 1920, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Bradford Co., May T., 1915, No. 210, on verdict for defendants in case of W, D. Browning v. Edwin L. Rodman and Nina B. Rodman. Issue to determine amount due on judgment. Before Maxwell, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict and judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were, (1) refusal of plaintiffs motion for judgment n. o. v., quoting record; (2-10) answers to points, and portions of charge, quoting them.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kephart,

Appellant, experienced for years in the growth and cultivation of ginseng, sold to appellee, who had never seen such plant and knew nothing about its cultivation, a farm in Bradford County, used for ginseng gardens. The consideration for this sale, and. for certain items of personal property, was liquidated by the transfer of a stock of merchandise of the value of $11,000, since disposed of, and a note of over $5,000. The note was reduced to judgment, and appellee, averring fraud in the procurement of the sale, had it opened, and on the issue thus framed the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. High v. BerretSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Curtis v. BuzardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Stetson v. CroskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. O'Rourke v. BlocksomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Lukens v. AikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Linda Coal & Supply Co. v. Tasa Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Levine v. Pittsburgh State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API