Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeals, Nos. 166-177PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion ry

Mr. Justice Simpson,

By agreement, these twelve actions for deceit were tried together before the president judge of the court below, without a jury; his findings were in favor of all the plaintiffs; exceptions thereto were dismissed and, from the judgments entered for plaintiffs, these twelve appeals were taken by defendants. They were argued together here, and will be decided in a single opinion.

The court below found that defendants, owning a controlling interest in a syndicate which had leased forty acres of land in what is known as the Miami Lead and Zinc field, situated in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griswold v. GebbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. New York Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. McNeile v. CridlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Jamison v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  5. McAleer v. McMurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Osterling v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Woodward v. DietrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Knop v. McMahanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API