Curtis v. Buzard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 276, Jan. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Erie Co., Feb. T., 1914, No. 208, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Daniel G. Curtis v. Robert T. Buzard. Trespass for false representations inducing sale of stock. The facts appear in the following opinion by Walling, P. J.: We are still of tbe opinion that plaintiff failed to show any damages -sustained by him by reason of the alleged fraud of defendant’s agent.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 276, Jan. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Erie Co., Feb. T., 1914, No. 208, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Daniel G. Curtis v. Robert T. Buzard. Trespass for false representations inducing sale of stock. The facts appear in the following opinion by Walling, P. J.: We are still of tbe opinion that plaintiff failed to show any damages -sustained by him by reason of the alleged fraud of defendant’s agent. The two Pennsylvania cases on which plaintiff mainly relies, that of Guffey v. Clever, 146 Pa. 548, and Weaver v. Cone, 174 Pa. 104, also reported in 12 Pa.…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This judgment is affirmed for the reason given by the learned trial judge for entering the nonsuit.
2Cited by20 opinions
- Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Weitzel v. JukichIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Tilghman v. DollenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.