Legal Opinion

Levine v. Pittsburgh State Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1924No. Appeals, 110 and 111PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

The plaintiffs, Samuel J. Levine and Nathan Levine, brought an action of trespass against the Pittsburgh State Bank and also a similar action against Jacob Roth, the bank’s president. Both grow out of the same transactions, involve the same questions and will be disposed of together. For convenience we will discuss the case against the bank. The defendant challenged the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ statement by an affidavit of defense raising law questions only; whereupon the court entered judgment for the defendant and plaintiffs have appealed. The judgment was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Reynolds v. BolandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Wolf v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. McCloskey v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Superior National Bank v. StadelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kepler v. KeplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Schuster v. LargmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Irwin v. WeikelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Peabody v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. United Mercantile Agencies v. SlotskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API