Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 3, 1992No. 91-1678PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

Wisconsin’s real estate foreclosure law allows lenders to choose between two different foreclosure routes. Route one gives the borrower a long redemption period but allows the lender to preserve its right to collect a deficiency judgment from the borrower. Route two provides for expedited foreclosure but requires the lender to fore-go its right to a deficiency judgment. This case involves an attempt by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) to exercise its federal indemnity right to seek reimbursement from a veteran for a loan guaranty payment the VA made to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Glover v. Marine Bank of Beaver DamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Whitehead v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  2. Boley v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Carter v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Rozema v. Marshfield ClinicDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Boley v. PrincipiDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API