Legal Opinion

Carter v. Derwinski

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1993No. 91-35530PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

We took this case en bane to consider whether Whitehead v. Derwinski, 904 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir.1990), should remain the law of the circuit.

Background

In recognition of the debt we owe the men and women who have served in our country’s armed forces in time of conflict, the Department of Veteran’s Affairs (“VA”) offers them home loan guarantees on terms substantially more favorable than those prevailing in the market. See generally 38 U.S.C. §§ 3701-3733. When a veteran takes advantage of the VA guarantee program, two legal relationships are established, both of which are…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  2. Lefebure v. D'aquilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  3. Malik v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. In Re James S. Hamada, Debtor. James S. Hamada v. Far East National Bank, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Boley v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API