Legal Opinion
Rozema v. Marshfield Clinic
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 19, 1997No. Nos. 96-C-592-C, 96-C-916-C and 96-C-730-CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
These are civil antitrust actions for monetary, declarative and injunctive relief brought pursuant to the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Wis. Stat. § 133.03. The Rozema, Malek and Halida plaintiffs contend that defendants The Marshfield Clinic and Security Health Plan of Wisconsin, Inc. violated the federal and state statutes by entering into a continuing contract, combination or conspiracy to divide markets illegally in restraint of trade.1 These consolidated cases are before the court on plaintiffs’ motions for class certification under Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Blihovde v. St. Croix CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Hammett v. American Bankers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- Warnell v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Loeb Industrial, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.