Legal Opinion
United States v. Rezzonico
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 6, 1998No. Civ. 97-479-PCT-EHCPublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARROLL, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion for reconsideration filed by the United States, acting on behalf of the Farmer’s Home Administration (“FmHA”), pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The United States asks the Court to set aside the December 30, 1997 judgment in this case based upon what it contends is legal error in the Court’s December 24, 1997 order granting summary judgment for Defendants. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court will grant the motion for reconsideration and vacate its previous order.
1. Background
This is an action for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- 35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 574, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,116 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Etc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and State of California Fair Employment and Housing Commission (Successor to State of California Fair Employment Practice Commission)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,305 United States of America v. Dos Cabezas Corp., an Arizona Corporation State of Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Motorola, Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mechanical Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Garcia v. BiterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Ramirez v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Teamsters Local 617 Pension & Welfare Funds v. Apollo Group, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Arteaga v. Asset Acceptance, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.