Legal Opinion

Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1989No. 88-385PublishedCited by 1,929 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

The question here is whether a predispute agreement to arbitrate claims under the Securities Act of 1933 is unenforceable, requiring resolution of the claims only in a judicial forum.

I

Petitioners are individuals who invested about $400,000 in securities. They signed a standard customer agreement with the broker, which included a clause stating that the parties agreed to settle any controversies “relating to [the] accounts” through binding arbitration that complies with specified procedures. The agreement to arbitrate these controversies is unqualified, unless it is found to be unenforceable…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,929 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

1,924 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API