Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The question here is whether a predispute agreement to arbitrate claims under the Securities Act of 1933 is unenforceable, requiring resolution of the claims only in a judicial forum.
I
Petitioners are individuals who invested about $400,000 in securities. They signed a standard customer agreement with the broker, which included a clause stating that the parties agreed to settle any controversies “relating to [the] accounts” through binding arbitration that complies with specified procedures. The agreement to arbitrate these controversies is unqualified, unless it is found to be unenforceable…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,929 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
1,924 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.