Legal Opinion
City of Santa Monica v. Grubb
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1966No. Civ. 30563PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHANTRY, J. pro tem. *
This is an application for a writ of mandate by the City of Santa Monica to compel the city clerk of Santa Monica to publish a notice inviting sealed proposals for the purchase of water revenue bonds as directed by a resolution of the Santa Monica City The clerk refuses to publish the notice on the asserted ground the proposed issuance of the revenue bonds is invalid as being in excess of the powers of the City of Santa Monica. The matter is submitted on a general demurrer, return, and answer to the petition.
The return and answer place in issue only the validity of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Santa Clara v. Von RaesfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bellus v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Creighton v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- First Street Plaza Partners v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Downey v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.