Legal Opinion

City of Downey v. Board of Administration

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1975No. Civ 44526PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLE, J. *

The appellants are the Cities of Downey and Glendora, as well as two individuals employed by Downey, an employee of Glendora, and an employee of the City of Santa Monica. This litigation revolves around the effect of certain legislation (Stats. 1971, ch. 170) amending the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Gov. Code, §§ 20000-21500.)

Contentions

The municipal appellants urge that the 1971 amendments had the effect of giving or lending their credit to the state and to other contracting agencies under the retirement law, in violation of former section 25, article XIII, of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Singer v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. City of Frederick v. QuinnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API