Legal Opinion

Creighton v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 1984No. B003559PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

160 Cal.App.3d 1011 (1984)

207 Cal. Rptr. 78

KAREN CREIGHTON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

CITY OF SANTA MONICA, et al., Defendants and Appellants; SANTA MONICA RENT CONTROL BOARD, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Docket No. B003559.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

October 12, 1984.

COUNSEL

Robert M. Myers, City Attorney, Stephen S. Stark, Assistant City Attorney, Karl M. Manheim and Martin T. Tachiki, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants.

Michael Heumann, Stephen P. Wiman, Marsha Jones Moutrie, Joel Martin Levy and Barbara O'Hearn for Real…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Sewerage and Water Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Mobilepark West Homeowners Ass'n v. Escondido Mobilepark WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Watson v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API