Legal Opinion

Price v. Chambers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1928No. 21225. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

The respondent, James R. Chambers, is an attorney at law. Plaintiff brought suit against him to recover the sum of $338.25, claiming that, in the course of his professional employment, the respondent, as her attorney, received approximately $1,000 for her use and benefit; that he paid to her certain amounts, and that on demand being made, refused to pay the balance of the money which he had collected. The answer denied generally any indebtedness, and alleged that respondent had been employed as attorney by the appellant and had represented her in a number of matters which, by the pleadings,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lindley v. McGlauflinWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Thiel v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Peterson v. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Gottstein v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Angeles Brewing & Malting Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King County v. Seawest Investment Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. King County v. SEAWEST INV. ASSOCIATES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Bain v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. In Re Estate of WrenWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Puget Sound National Bank of Tacoma v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API