Legal Opinion

Gottstein v. Harrington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1901No. 3192PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

This action was brought by appellants to set aside a satisfaction of record of a certain chattel mortgage, to reinstate the said mortgage, and to foreclose the same, and sell the property covered thereby to satisfy an alleged attorney’s lien on said mortgage and said property, and the amount due appellants from defendants Harrington and Daw, on an open account. The facts and circumstances, as presented in the record, are substantially as follows: Messrs. Brady & Gay and Milo A. Boot, as attorneys, were employed by defendant Frank Daw to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonald v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In re WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
  3. Larned v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. Chappell v. DannNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Hurlbert v. BrighamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ross v. ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Beckmann v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Erickson v. KendallWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Price v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hudson v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API