Legal Opinion

Puget Sound National Bank of Tacoma v. Olsen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1933No. 24547. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover upon five promissory notes and a written agreement guaranteeing the payment of the same, and to foreclose the lien of certain pledges of collateral security. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings, conclusions and judgment favorable to plaintiff. The defendant Mrs. A. P. Olsen alone has appealed. For convenience, the plaintiff will be referred to as “the bank;” the defendant Olsen as “appellant;” the defendant corporation as “the company;” and the other parties defendant merely as “defendants.”

The defendant company is a corporation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vickerman v. KappWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Price v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BrundWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Herz v. RansomWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rattelmiller v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DeLisleWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Automatic Canteen Co. v. Automatic Canteen Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bohlke v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Carlson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API