Legal Opinion

Lindley v. McGlauflin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1910No. 8448PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered June 23, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action on money demands involving an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in an action tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. The defendant contended that the action was an action at law, and demanded a trial by jury, paying into court a jury fee. The court, however, ruled that the action was one of equitable cognizance, properly triable as such, and proceeded accordingly. The correctness of this holding is the sole question presented by the appeal.

The complaint of the plaintiff contained three separate causes of action. In the first it was alleged, in brief, that the plaintiff was the lessee of a certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Starks v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Daniel v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Thiel v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bain v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API